• Data Economy

    The SEO benefits of green hosting

    The true weak spot of hosting companies is the lack of referrals from quality websites, which often translates into a low SEO-value.  For green Hosters however, there might be more good news on the horizon. The hosting market is very crowded, with many [read more]
    byRené Post | 23/Jan/20153 min read
    FacebookTwitterGoogle+WhatsAppEvernotePocketKindle ItBufferLinkedIn
    x
    Bookmark

    The true weak spot of hosting companies is the lack of referrals from quality websites, which often translates into a low SEO-value.  For green Hosters however, there might be more good news on the horizon.

    The hosting market is very crowded, with many companies fighting for attention from potential customers with something that is – let’s face it – more or less a generic product. This means companies have to turn to advertising, sponsoring, or to that most dangerous of strategies: comparison sites, where one bad day in your data-center can ruin your ranking for years to come.

    Recently I stumbled upon the true weak spot of hosting companies: the lack of referrals from quality websites. You can have a million customers, but if no one mentions you on those million websites, in SEO-terms you could still be losing from your neighbor who is hosting dinner-parties.

    In the hosting-sector, this leads to a kind of black hole around hosters. Try for instance a Google-search for ‘hosted by One.com‘, ‘websites hosted by Strato’, or for ‘Dreamhost.com‘. All three companies have over a million hosted domains, but hardly any actual customer recommendations for their hosting services

    What grabbed my attention, was the fact that The Green Web Foundation’s http://www.thegreenwebfoundation.org website link appears on the first or second page, while we are relatively still a very small project with around 2000 visitors per month. There are countless referrals from parked sites to large hosters, but since these referring sites have no content and no visitors, their SEO-value is close to zero.

    There is another problem: even if you are mentioned and linked to as a supplier from normal functioning sites, without some relevant content match between that site and the hosting business, the value of the backlink is probably limited. Relevance matters, so if you are a green host, a free listing in The Green Web Foundation’s online directory will be worth its weight to the search engines, so it’s a good link to have.

    [Tweet “For green hosters however, there might be more good news on the horizon.”]

    While it is true that there is in general no content match between, for instance Beverly Hills Church Pre-school and Dreamhost.com, this all changes when the pre-school site includes a page on their website about their sustainability efforts. As their choice to host withDreamhost.com was part of their sustainability-policy, and their policy states that clearly, adding a Green Host Dreamhost badge backlinked to Dreamhost’s sustainability-section will give them both extra points with the search engines.

    In SEO-terms, green hosting and sustainability are on-topic backlinks, highlighting the sustainability endeavors of both companies, and making it much easier for the hosting company to stand out – without paying for it by Adwords, sponsorship or paid links.

    photo credits: jacsonquerubin
    FacebookTwitterGoogle+WhatsAppEvernotePocketKindle ItBufferLinkedIn
    x
    Bookmark
  • Data Economy

    ‘Green’ data centers: easier & cheaper than you think

    Data centers are formidable energy suckers, accounting for a large share of Internet energy consumption. Worse, they rely heavily on fossil power. Yet slashing their carbon footprint is far from inconceivable. Cloud computing technologies may help. In th [read more]
    byRené Post | 17/Dec/20145 min read
    FacebookTwitterGoogle+WhatsAppEvernotePocketKindle ItBufferLinkedIn
    x
    Bookmark

    Data centers are formidable energy suckers, accounting for a large share of Internet energy consumption. Worse, they rely heavily on fossil power. Yet slashing their carbon footprint is far from inconceivable. Cloud computing technologies may help.

    In this age of ultra-fast fiber, we still need to generate the electrons that will keep the photons flowing with the speed of light across the globe. Estimates show that worldwide around 10% of all electricity generated now is consumed within the digital domain, with a new iPhone consuming more energy than the average refrigerator.

    Datacenters account for around 3%, so the location of datacenters is very much interlinked with the availability of cheap electrical power – naturally or subsidized.

    The energy generation landscape in Europe however is changing quickly. Fossil fuel powered electricity plants in countries like Danmark and Germany are being phased out, and the effects are not limited to countries that embrace the ‘Energiewende’ but ripples across borders, disrupting existing energy markets in ‘slower’ countries like the Netherlands and Belgium.

    But although a new era is clearly looming, Newton’s second law still applies. So a coal power plant in the Netherlands that gets pushed out of business by German wind-power, does not simply close down but draws new plans to attract the aluminium melters of this age: datacenters.

    And why not – isn’t that how we modernize the economy? On paper the marriage between old-style power plants and datacenters looks ideal: coal & nuclear power-plants need baseload-clients, and here they are.

    Compare that with the perceived unpredictability of solar and wind-power, and it seems inevitable that (non-hydro producing) countries that want to play a role in this digital age, are stuck with fossil power generation for a long time to come…

    But is that really so? The underlying assumption that I want to challenge here, is that data-centers can indeed be seen as old-style factories that need a stable energy consumption, but that is not a necessity that is dictated from a technological point of view.

    Let us turn back shortly to the electrons & photons: the economics of electricity transport over longer distances might be terrible, but the economics of transporting data looks way much better.

    Facebook operates an 27.000 m2 data-center near Luleå in North-Sweden – where there are more moose than people and that is several thousands of kilometers away from the larger city centres in Europe where the users are. But that kind of distance is not very relevant on the Internet, since Berlin, Paris and London are just a few miliseconds away.

    But by the same reasoning large solar powered plants in North-Africa, could just as easily provide the European (and African, and Middle-Eastern) Internet with all the photons they need.

    Or what about the North-sea, on a windy winternight – groups of windmills with data-centers directlty built into it? No powerlines to shore, only a few fibers?

    [Tweet “This would very quickly lead to an Internet that would be powered mainly by renewables”]

    The only requisite would be, that these datacenters could share their data, so that they can all deliver the same data in principle, but depended on where the electricity is the most abundant at that moment, that datacenter will take over the main load.

    Oh, and that principle about sharing the data across multiple locations? It might sound high-tech, but actually it is invented a while ago, it is called ‘The Cloud’.

    FacebookTwitterGoogle+WhatsAppEvernotePocketKindle ItBufferLinkedIn
    x
    Bookmark